Senate Democrats drop public health option

If it wasn't so true, I'd laugh.

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd laugh.

yes but he did it all for our benefit. really, he even said so

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd laugh.

yes but he did it all for our benefit. really, he even said so

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd laugh.

yes but he did it all for our benefit. really, he even said so

oh there were a lot more lies than that

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd laugh.

yes but he did it all for our benefit. really, he even said so

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

[quote="Joebert"][quote="KK"]

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

[quote="KK"][quote="Joebert"]

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

[quote="Joebert"][quote="KK"]

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

Can he read? Is in in Ebonics?

[quote="Joebert"][quote="KK"]

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

no, he doesn't care what it says

[quote="Giada"][quote="Joebert"]

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

Can he read? Is in in Ebonics?

this idiot just wants something to pass

[quote="KK"][quote="Giada"]

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

Can he read? Is in in Ebonics?

this idiot just wants something to pass

I agree, if it says Health Care on the top page he will sign it and we will have to borrow to pay for it.

[quote="Joebert"][quote="KK"]

Giada wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

If it wasn't so true, I'd

oh there were a lot more lies than that

Yep hundreds and hundreds of pages none of them have read.

this uber left wing group that e mails me is freaking out over this bill

We should all be freaking out it passed. Think Obama wil read it all before signing.

Can he read? Is in in Ebonics?

this idiot just wants something to pass

I agree, if it says Health Care on the top page he will sign it and we will have to borrow to pay for it.

now the senate and house have to negotiate to come up with a common plan. what how much it changes. watch how expensive it gets

Oh it will be expensive but remember it's our money.

Joebert wrote:

Oh it will be expensive but remember it's our money.

we need to collectively stop paying taxes

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Oh it will be expensive but remember it's our money.

we need to collectively stop paying taxes

Once everyone is out of a job shoud do it.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Oh it will be expensive but remember it's our money.

we need to collectively stop paying taxes

Once everyone is out of a job shoud do it.

they still tax unemployment

the local county law enforcement agency just gave themselves all pay increases


listen to this explanation:

with the previous cutbacks to staff because of the recession driven lack of funds we are all
working extra hard to make up for the personnel shortage


the reporter asked :
why not use the money to hire more staff ?

answer:
because a new hire is not producing (worth their pay) for a year, it takes one year to
properly train a new hire


and then he said something about if you have money do you buy a fancy radio first or new tires for your car?

c/thru wrote:

the local county law enforcement agency just gave themselves all pay increases


listen to this explanation:

with the previous cutbacks to staff because of the recession driven lack of funds we are all
working extra hard to make up for the personnel shortage


the reporter asked :
why not use the money to hire more staff ?

answer:
because a new hire is not producing (worth their pay) for a year, it takes one year to
properly train a new hire


and then he said something about if you have money do you buy a fancy radio first or new tires for your car?

i fix what is broken. so in a year they wil still be short untrained new staff. then what?

they say the have to keep competitive and pay their greatly qualified staff so they will stay...


didn't the Banks use that line over our bailout charity ?


and...if these people are so highly qualified how come they can't discern good candidates from what must be a huge, huge pile of resumes available...and how come they can't get a new hire up to par in a better time frame?


How hard is it to write speeding tickets?

c/thru wrote:

they say the have to keep competitive and pay their greatly qualified staff so they will stay...


didn't the Banks use that line over our bailout charity ?


and...if these people are so highly qualified how come they can't discern good candidates from what must be a huge, huge pile of resumes available...and how come they can't get a new hire up to par in a better time frame?


How hard is it to write speeding tickets?

let them go. but go where? there are millions of people out of work looking to fill positions.

what's happened is they, like politicians, have made the job about them. not about doing what is right.

I know a lot of guys that did what ever they could to help the company be better and still got laid off.

Joebert wrote:

I know a lot of guys that did what ever they could to help the company be better and still got laid off.

but the first to go are usually the slackers or non essentials. you have to make yourself essential. sometimes there is just nothing you can do though

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

I know a lot of guys that did what ever they could to help the company be better and still got laid off.

but the first to go are usually the slackers or non essentials. you have to make yourself essential. sometimes there is just nothing you can do though

These guys are essential but had to leave anyway. The work just gets moved to other people that don't have time to do both jobs.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

I know a lot of guys that did what ever they could to help the company be better and still got laid off.

but the first to go are usually the slackers or non essentials. you have to make yourself essential. sometimes there is just nothing you can do though

These guys are essential but had to leave anyway. The work just gets moved to other people that don't have time to do both jobs.

then the company will probably suffer