| Pentagon still wants better stun guns | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
c/thru
Blurts : What is this decade called ? Location : almost Mile High Hobbies : Freedom Tracker Humor : floating under a delicate layer of apathy Super Powers : can turn water into ice Number of posts : 3049 pennies : 3303 Rep : 123
| Subject: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:02 pm | |
| Pentagon Tests Technology for New Stun Gunupdated 2010 reportA Pentagon office that helped develop microwave weapons that cause intense pain, lasers that temporarily blind people, and devices that emit intolerable levels of sound, is now working on a technology that uses electrical pulses to incapacitate people. If the research proves successful, it could lead to a new, more effective type of wireless stun gun. Nanosecond electrical pulses may have applications for nonlethal weapons, but this rapidly developing area of biological research has also attracted interest because of its potential medical applications, including as a treatment for cancer. Though the Joint Nonlethal Weapons Program Office did not respond to questions about what researchers have been supported by their funding, the Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia has emerged as the leading player in this field. The Joint Nonlethal Weapons Programs Directorate has spent just short of two million dollars on the research over the past few years, and is currently reviewing funding for the next year and beyond. Other Defense Department offices, such as of the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force Research Laboratory, have also been involved in the research. But how soon, if ever, the research will lead to a weapon in unclear; Pentagon officials working on the program declined to speculate on the time line. "This technology is not yet mature enough for human testing," wrote Dr. Wright. LINK to source | |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Blurts : smilies will inherit the earth Location : Cloud 9 Hobbies : code Humor : binding Super Powers : early spambot detection Number of posts : 177 pennies : 10000095 Rep : 12
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:10 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
phluffy
Blurts : lolcat wants me Location : OhighO Hobbies : chasing dustbunnies Super Powers : smuggling, looking innocent Number of posts : 139 pennies : 178 Rep : 18
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:42 pm | |
| and the american people still want better politicians, healthcare and pizzas | |
|
| |
KK
Location : New York Super Powers : poastwhore Number of posts : 8316 pennies : 7853 Rep : 354
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:50 pm | |
| we really are heading to star wars | |
|
| |
java
Number of posts : 3126 pennies : 2097 Rep : 58
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:02 pm | |
| "This technology is not yet mature enough for human testing," wrote Dr. Wright.
I wonder what they test it on then?
"...this rapidly developing area of biological research has also attracted interest because of its potential medical applications, including as a treatment for cancer." | |
|
| |
KK
Location : New York Super Powers : poastwhore Number of posts : 8316 pennies : 7853 Rep : 354
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:48 pm | |
| - java wrote:
- "This technology is not yet mature enough for human testing," wrote Dr. Wright.
I wonder what they test it on then?
"...this rapidly developing area of biological research has also attracted interest because of its potential medical applications, including as a treatment for cancer." they need something to replace waterboarding | |
|
| |
java
Number of posts : 3126 pennies : 2097 Rep : 58
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:13 pm | |
| Used to call it electro-shock "therapy" ... | |
|
| |
c/thru
Blurts : What is this decade called ? Location : almost Mile High Hobbies : Freedom Tracker Humor : floating under a delicate layer of apathy Super Powers : can turn water into ice Number of posts : 3049 pennies : 3303 Rep : 123
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:44 pm | |
| - java wrote:
- "This technology is not yet mature enough for human testing," wrote Dr. Wright.
I wonder what they test it on then?
"...this rapidly developing area of biological research has also attracted interest because of its potential medical applications, including as a treatment for cancer." it's not like that's stopped them before | |
|
| |
java
Number of posts : 3126 pennies : 2097 Rep : 58
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:49 pm | |
| - c/thru wrote:
- java wrote:
- "This technology is not yet mature enough for human testing," wrote Dr. Wright.
I wonder what they test it on then?
"...this rapidly developing area of biological research has also attracted interest because of its potential medical applications, including as a treatment for cancer."
it's not like that's stopped them before They think they're "mature enough" now... | |
|
| |
Joebert
Age : 63 Location : @ Computer Hobbies : Sleep/Photography Humor : Seinfeld (show) has it all! Super Powers : Faster than a speeding bulet...is that bad? Number of posts : 3905 pennies : 3262 Rep : 97
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:34 am | |
| Hell, I would like a better stun gun too. | |
|
| |
KK
Location : New York Super Powers : poastwhore Number of posts : 8316 pennies : 7853 Rep : 354
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:56 pm | |
| - Joebert wrote:
- Hell, I would like a better stun gun too.
use them often do you? | |
|
| |
java
Number of posts : 3126 pennies : 2097 Rep : 58
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:02 pm | |
| I want one with variable settings from "stun" to "disintegrate." | |
|
| |
Giada
Location : Happy Hour Humor : Good Number of posts : 2011 pennies : 2069 Rep : 154
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:26 am | |
| - java wrote:
- I want one with variable settings from "stun" to "disintegrate."
Test that one on Nancy Pelosi. | |
|
| |
c/thru
Blurts : What is this decade called ? Location : almost Mile High Hobbies : Freedom Tracker Humor : floating under a delicate layer of apathy Super Powers : can turn water into ice Number of posts : 3049 pennies : 3303 Rep : 123
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:47 pm | |
| I think stun guns should be for everyone !!! seriously, EVERYONE, instead of guns with bullets
They are legal in many states | |
|
| |
KK
Location : New York Super Powers : poastwhore Number of posts : 8316 pennies : 7853 Rep : 354
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:46 pm | |
| - c/thru wrote:
- I think stun guns should be for everyone !!! seriously, EVERYONE, instead of guns with bullets
They are legal in many states we have one, and some guns with bullets. never had to use them though | |
|
| |
phluffy
Blurts : lolcat wants me Location : OhighO Hobbies : chasing dustbunnies Super Powers : smuggling, looking innocent Number of posts : 139 pennies : 178 Rep : 18
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:16 pm | |
| I have a paintball gun and if you ever played, you know they smart | |
|
| |
KK
Location : New York Super Powers : poastwhore Number of posts : 8316 pennies : 7853 Rep : 354
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:43 pm | |
| - phluffy wrote:
- I have a paintball gun and if you ever played, you know they smart
some of those things, especially the green gas ones sting | |
|
| |
java
Number of posts : 3126 pennies : 2097 Rep : 58
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:29 pm | |
| - phluffy wrote:
- I have a paintball gun and if you ever played, you know they smart
Izzat what they call a "smart weapon?" | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Pentagon still wants better stun guns | |
| |
|
| |
| Pentagon still wants better stun guns | |
|