Man bulldozes his foreclosed home

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

the judge will say he is still responsible for his loan. same as if the house was still standing. they foreclose, they get the property as is

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

the judge will say he is still responsible for his loan. same as if the house was still standing. they foreclose, they get the property as is

They aren't going to let this guy just walk away.

He can just plead "temporary insanity due to PMS".

Giada wrote:

He can just plead "temporary insanity due to PMS".

No question about it the guy is nuts and as long as the bank didn't do anything illegal it will be interesting to see how this goes down. But I don't think you are going to see people bulldozing their houses in anytime soon.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

the judge will say he is still responsible for his loan. same as if the house was still standing. they foreclose, they get the property as is

They aren't going to let this guy just walk away.

all they can do is hold him responsible for the amount he has on loan

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

the judge will say he is still responsible for his loan. same as if the house was still standing. they foreclose, they get the property as is

They aren't going to let this guy just walk away.

all they can do is hold him responsible for the amount he has on loan

And I hope they get every penny.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Just wondering, who would have more money for lawyers the bank or a guy with financial problems? Looking forward to how this story plays out.

he can just sit back and let them spin their wheels

I'll wait to hear what the judge says.

the judge will say he is still responsible for his loan. same as if the house was still standing. they foreclose, they get the property as is

They aren't going to let this guy just walk away.

all they can do is hold him responsible for the amount he has on loan

And I hope they get every penny.

all he has to do is stay defaulted or claim bamkruptcy.

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

Giada wrote:

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

all those road and bridge building jobs obama promised

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

all those road and bridge building jobs obama promised

Again the way the courts work they will probably blame Caterpillar because that's what he used. So Caterpillar must be found at fault too.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

all those road and bridge building jobs obama promised

Again the way the courts work they will probably blame Caterpillar because that's what he used. So Caterpillar must be found at fault too.

lol, sound like you are a judge

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

all those road and bridge building jobs obama promised

Again the way the courts work they will probably blame Caterpillar because that's what he used. So Caterpillar must be found at fault too.

lol, sound like you are a judge

Not a judge but that's about how they reason at times.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Giada wrote:

Geez, I hope they don't take his bulldozer! He can always get a job as a demolition man.

all those road and bridge building jobs obama promised

Again the way the courts work they will probably blame Caterpillar because that's what he used. So Caterpillar must be found at fault too.

lol, sound like you are a judge

Not a judge but that's about how they reason at times.

lol at reason

Seems they are just polititions too.

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

It's Idiot vs idiot now and who has the most idiots on their team. Screw what the people of the USA think, the idiots all know what is best for us. They don't represent the people anymore, the people that got them elected. I think there are going to be more CHANGE at the next election.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

It's Idiot vs idiot now and who has the most idiots on their team. Screw what the people of the USA think, the idiots all know what is best for us. They don't represent the people anymore, the people that got them elected. I think there are going to be more CHANGE at the next election.

do you know anyone in real life who is as polarized as congress?

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

It's Idiot vs idiot now and who has the most idiots on their team. Screw what the people of the USA think, the idiots all know what is best for us. They don't represent the people anymore, the people that got them elected. I think there are going to be more CHANGE at the next election.

do you know anyone in real life who is as polarized as congress?

Some, but I didn't elect them.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

It's Idiot vs idiot now and who has the most idiots on their team. Screw what the people of the USA think, the idiots all know what is best for us. They don't represent the people anymore, the people that got them elected. I think there are going to be more CHANGE at the next election.

do you know anyone in real life who is as polarized as congress?

Some, but I didn't elect them.

i think more people I know who are polarized are liberal

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

Seems they are just polititions too.

absolutely. there is no neutral ground in washington

It's Idiot vs idiot now and who has the most idiots on their team. Screw what the people of the USA think, the idiots all know what is best for us. They don't represent the people anymore, the people that got them elected. I think there are going to be more CHANGE at the next election.

do you know anyone in real life who is as polarized as congress?

Some, but I didn't elect them.

i think more people I know who are polarized are liberal

I see you don't know my friends.

I see you don't know my friends.[/quote] nope

KK wrote:

I see you don't know my friends.

nope[/quote]

Here it seems to me the other way around.

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

I see you don't know my friends.

nope

Here it seems to me the other way around.[/quote]

I don't know anybody here

KK wrote:

Joebert wrote:

KK wrote:

I see you don't know my friends.

nope

Here it seems to me the other way around.

I don't know anybody here[/quote]

No anyone over THERE?